Rattlesnake Revolution – The Audio Book

RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION
The Audio Book is Coming Soon!

As I have done book signings and other events, I have been asked numerous times if there was an Audio version of RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION? Until now, the answer was no. I have exciting news to report. We are working with a major media figure to produce an Audio book that will be available very soon.
The Audio version will include the full text of the written book. Starting with the Boston Tea Party of 1773, I cover the history and origins of the tea party movement. This is not another diagnosis of problems in America. It is a “how to” manual on fixing those problems. With RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION the tea party member, or group, is prepared to return America to constitutional government. I show you how to defeat RINO’s, Democrats, communists, socialists, and return both the Republican Party, and our republic, to the free market ideals and freedom-oriented philosophies of our founding fathers.
     There are plenty of books on the market explaining the influences of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome, Illuminati, on the RINO establishment. The question becomes, what do you do with all the information? How do you hold elected officials accountable for all the high sounding ideals in the Declaration of Independence, constitution, Bill of Rights, and the platform of the Republican Party?
     We already know all the problems caused by Obama with government bailouts, subsidies and takeovers of private businesses. Thanks to the work of Michele Bachmann, Jim DeMint, Dick Armey, Newt Gingrich, and other patriotic leaders, we know how Obamacare and other schemes are driving the national debt into the stratosphere.
     RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION is both a book, and a website, dedicated to what you actually do about these problems and how we fix the Republican Party so we can fix the American republic. The current political battles over honest money, the growth of big government, go back to the founding of our republic. After the American Revolution the founders debated our monetary system at the Constitutional Convention in 1789. They discussed these matters when debating the ratification of our constitution and as they adopted our Bill of rights in 1791.
     To fix modern economic problems, patriots within the tea party movement must have a firm understanding of how and why the founders rejected fiat money and paper substitutes for real money. Without knowledge our people perish. Many have failed to understand how Mr. Lincoln, and his contemporary and admirer Karl Marx, undermined constitutional money, replacing gold and silver in the hands of the people with paper instruments issued by banks and governments.

     In RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION, I explain how our founding fathers created a system of federal taxation, based largely upon excises, which would fund the legitimate functions of the federal government while preserving the autonomy of the states, and the freedom of the people. Fixing the problems in America today will require tax reform based upon understanding, and returning to, a constitutional system of taxation that raises revenue, rather than redistributing wealth.

     To fix the problems eating away the soul of America, we are going to have to do much more than just repeal Obamacare and oppose new stimulus and bailout plans. We are going to need to embrace the philosophy of freedom that animated Patrick Henry, Paul Revere, Sam Adams, Howard Jarvis, and Ronald Reagan. We are going to need to scrap a federal tax code with ten times as many words as the King James Version of the Holy Bible.

     We don’t need to settle for minor tinkering with budgets, borrowing, bailouts, and bureaucracy. We must work for, and achieve, fundamental tax reform and currency reform that will restore the balance achieved by Article I, Section 10 of the constitution and by the 9th and 10th Amendments that preserved states rights.

To accomplish these objectives, RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION, the book, and the website, compares and contrasts the Tea Party Movement with other major social and political movements that have fundamentally changed America over the last two hundred years.

     In each case there is a problem or crisis, whether it is slavery, labor strife, social conditions, or individual rights. Movements as diverse as Abolition, women’s suffrage, prohibition, labor, civil rights, and the tea party movement, have gone through five stages if they were successful in permanently solving a problem and fundamentally transforming how American culture and government respond to a given crisis.

     Those five stages are, recognition of the crisis, then by indignant protests of the injustice of the crisis. Those protests coalesce into permanent organizations, and the organizations influence elections. Newly elected public servants, in the final stage, take legislative action to fix the problem.

     The tea party movement has made amazing strides in just three years. They have accomplished three of these five stages in only three years. In contrast, slavery, women’s suffrage, prohibition, labor reform, and civil rights, among other movements, have taken decades and in some cases over a century, to rack up such accomplishments. To finish the job and fix our republic, we are going to need more than just a Republican president and Cut, Cap & Balance; we are going to need tax reform and currency reform that restore constitutional government in America and jumpstart our economic system.

     RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION lays out the blueprint for total success and how we can, working together, fix America by retuning to the Spirit of 1776!

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Rattlesnake Revolution

Rattlesnake Revolution

8 Rutledge Avenue, Greenville, South Carolina 29617

www.RattlesnakeRevolution.com

(843) 597-7459

For Immediate Release

Of Interest to editors and journalists covering:

Tea Party/ Books/ Politics/ History/ Election 2012

Greenville, South Carolina – January 26, 2012

Hill-Pehle Publishing announces the February 1, 2012 release of Dean Allen’s newest Book:

RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION the Tea Party Strikes! 

Rattlesnake Revolution, takes a lively romp through American history from the Boston Tea Party in 1773, to the tea party near you today. Along the way, author Dean Allen has compared and contrasted the roots and interactions of the major socio-political movements that have shaped American culture. Acting at various times as a journalist, historian, and political activist, Dean has chronicled the development of a spontaneous phenomenon that fundamentally revitalized the somewhat stodgy Grand Old Party.

 

Dean’s insights and observations give the tea party credit for amazing accomplishments in a short period, without glossing over weaknesses, and challenges, of a movement priding itself on being disorganized and leaderless. His access to, and friendships with, statesmen like Michele Bachmann, Jim DeMint, and dozens of local tea party leaders across the nation, allowed Dean to see, experience, understand, and explain, the roots of this revolution that swept Democrats from Congress in 2010, and is poised to restore constitutional government to America in 2012.

 

Rattlesnake Revolution chronicles the developmental stages of all socio-political movements. Great social movements have started with outrage over a problem, whether slavery, labor, or economic injustice. They began with protests in the street; these became effective organizations, gained cultural acceptance; and, finally legislatively transformed the way our nation dealt with problems. Is the tea party a flash-in-the-pan destined to fade into oblivion? Will the tea party become the next paradigm shift permanently liberating our republic from a sea of red ink? Rattlesnake Revolution seeks to provide the tools for the latter outcome.

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina, Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina, Tea Party | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Rattlesnake Revolution

Dean Allen has just published a new book RATTLESNAKE REVOLUTION: The Tea Party Strikes!

To buy this book, go to the website:

RattlesnakeRevolution.com

Dean has also listed links to numerous other conservative organizations that are great sources of useful information to conservative activists.

This is a work in progress, so check back often and feel free to make suggestions for other sites that deserve inclusion on the list.

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Comments Off

10 Point Plan to Save America

In a recent discussion of potential GOP presidential nominees, several writers suggested a candidate should have a clear written plan for how he or she would solve the problems facing our country. That seems very reasonable to me. I sat down, made a list of the ten most important things facing our republic today. No presidential candidate I am aware of has agreed to each of these ten points.

There are ten key issues that must be addressed:

National Security. Islam is at war with us. We are failing to acknowledge the fact, and deal with it in an appropriate manner.
Secure Our Borders. We have open borders, permeable to illegal aliens, drugs, terrorists, and their weapons. We must secure our borders and deport all illegal aliens in a similar manner to Operation Wetback by President Eisenhower in 1954.
Education. The notion there should be free public schools is not found in our constitution; it comes from the Communist Manifesto. We need to recognize that the government monopoly model of delivering education has failed miserably. We need to adopt online distance learning for K-12 education as an adjunct to home schooling. We need to abolish the federal Department of Education.
Energy Independence. We have more oil, gas, and coal than the rest of the world combined. These things are plentiful here. We need to drill here, drill now, and build more nuclear power plants. We need to abolish the federal Department of Energy.
End Racial Discrimination. The only group discriminated against, based on race, in America today, is the white male. We need to end all affirmative action, quotas, and any other racially based preferences. People should be judged solely on merit, ability, – and nothing else!
Honest Money. We need to return the United States to constitutional honest money, consisting only of circulating gold and silver coins which are legal tender for their face value. We must also retire all paper notes not redeemable for gold and silver on demand. We need to abolish the Federal Reserve and transfer all of its assets and liabilities to the U. S. Treasury.
Debt & Deficit Spending. We need to stop borrowing money. The government needs to live within its means, and do it now, not some day. We need to sell publicly owned lands not being used for constitutional purposes like docks, arsenals, Forts, Naval yards, Post Offices, or Court Houses. Sell national parks to people who will operate them at a profit and pay taxes. We can abolish the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Tax Fairness. We need only one federal tax, a sales tax on new goods, exempting food and prescription medicines. There needs to be one rate for everybody without any exemptions, allowances, exceptions, rebates, prebates, credits or deductions. Tax laws must only be used to raise revenue, never to redistribute wealth or regulate economic activity. We need to abolish the Internal Revenue Service.
Organized Labor Reform. We need a national right-to-work law. No federal, state, or municipal employee should ever strike. We need Congressional investigations into Union violence, intimidation and corruption.
Economic Freedom & Prosperity. American jobs and American manufacturing have been driven overseas by excessive regulations that are not a problem in other countries. We need to abolish the EPA, OSHA, NLRB, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.

Now you know what Dean Allen would run on if he was a presidential candidate. [I am not a candidate for any office in 2012 and do not anticipate that changing.] Now you know my views. I welcome your comments.

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Donkey Dumb Congresscritters

Suppose your alcoholic son comes to you and says “Dad, I am only making $46,000 a year on my job but it takes me $78,000 to live. My credit cards are maxed out at $243,000 and the bank is threatening to cut off my line of credit on August 2nd. You have to help me keep borrowing!”

My reply would be “No, son, you need to drink less, work more, quit borrowing, and spend some of your $46,000 income to pay down your bills.”

But dad, I like drinking. I will no longer be popular with my buddies if I stop drinking. After all, one reason I am popular is I buy them drinks too!”

Son, there are things in life more important than being popular with your drinking buddies. You need to stop drinking, work harder, and figure out how you are going to pay your bills.”

This is a common sense conversation, the advice any reasonable father would give a prodigal son. Here is where common sense goes out the window, and Congresscritters get really dumb. Those numbers are the US government income, debt, & expenses, divided by the number of families in America, based upon a family of four. Instead of drinking alcohol, Congresscritters spend money on programs to buy votes and keep themselves popular with the 47% of Americans who do not pay any income taxes at all.

Dad, you don’t understand how bad my situation really is. Unless I get my credit card limits raised I am not going to be able to make my house payments after August 2nd!”

“No son, you will have plenty of money from your $46,000 salary to make your mortgage payments, and even to pay at least the interest on your credit cards. However, you will have to stop drinking.”

“But Dad, you are a rich guy and you could just co-sign my debt so I could continue to finance all my necessary spending.”

“Son, you are right. I could co-sign your debt, and you would continue to live beyond your means, on borrowed money, after August 2nd. Of course, if I do that, and you continue to drink and run up bar tabs, there will come a time when you and I both can’t pay our debts, then we both lose everything we own.”

Dad, I want you to negotiate with me in good faith. I will agree to stop drinking…. some day, if you will just co-sign my credit cards right now, so I can keep running up my bar tab after August 2nd.”

You and I know exactly how to give tough love, to a family member with these numbers and spending habits. This situation is not fixed by Daddy pulling a Band-Aid off, or eating peas. This problem requires alcoholic Son Barry to get in a 12 step program now, and get the spending monkey off his back.

For some unknown reason, an educated man can win an election, become a Congresscritter, move to Washington, D.C., and he gets stupid enough to “negoitate” co-signing more debt. Debt that allows irresponsible colleagues to spend money…. borrowed money, on programs to make them popular with folks who do not work for a living or pay any taxes.

To her credit, Congresswoman Michele Bachamnn says she has a “titanium spine” and absolutely will not agree to raise the debt limit, under any circumstances. Mr. Obama is threatening to not pay the Army, not pay the interest due on US bonds, and not send out Social Security checks after August 2nd unless Republicans cave in to his extortion and agree to raise the debt limit. Now is the time for the rest of the Congresscritters to learn what Mrs. Bachmann already understands. If the federal government of the United States stops spending $1.4 Trillion dollars a year more than they take in, there will be no need to raise the debt limit. There is plenty of money. As Ronald Reagan used to say, “We don’t have a taxing problem; we have a spending problem.”

Spineless cowards like Mitch McConnell say we must cave in and raise the debt limit, or the United States is going to default on its financial obligations. That’s the alcoholic son again…. “Dad, unless you co-sign my visa card I will not have money for food to eat, or be able to pay my mortgage; I will only have enough money left for drinking and partying.”

The time has come to tell Barack Obama and Mitch McConnell “No more borrowed money. None. Nada. Zilch. The borrowing stops on August 2nd.” Follow that up with more bad news for Donkeycrats and RINO’s, “You will use the $2,400,000,000,000.00 the federal government has coming in already, to pay the Army, fund Social Security checks, and pay the interest on our past debt.” If there is not enough money for all the insane, shovel ready stimulus, foreign aid, welfare, bailouts, farm subsidies, and earmarks, that make you popular; cut out those things. We need to cut out those things now, not in August, not by the end of the year, not after the 2012 elections, we need to cut that spending now!

“Dad, you don’t understand. This deadline by the bank is real and they will cut off my credit cards on August 2nd unless you co-sign my debts. There is just nothing I can do. You have simply got to help me. You don’t understand just how bad it really is. I know it is pathetic, but I am begging, I am almost ready to pee in my pants & cry like a girl.”

Son, you need to get a backbone, work more, spend less, stop drinking, and pay off your debts. No, things really are not as bad as you claim. You just do not want to stop drinking, or stop buying booze for your buddies, all on borrowed money. If you really had to stand up like a man and be responsible, there are plenty of other options. Remember son, you own half the land west of the Mississippi River and you are not even collecting rent on most of it.

OK, your real son is not an alcoholic, you were a better father than that. My question is, what are you going to do about your Congresscritter? Yours may be one of those on a binge, and unfortunately the Donkeycrats are not the only ones with the problem. What are you doing about it? Your end of the lifeboat is sinking too, so shut up and bail.

That’s my opinion on this phoney crisis. What’s yours? I welcome your comments.

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | 4 Comments

Patriot Act Reauthorization Necessary

There is a lot of confusion and misinformation about the Patriot Act. I was researching the actual provisions of the Act when I came across this brief essay by freshman Congressman Trey Gowdy, a Republican from the 4th District of South Carolina. He just happens to be my Congressman. Trey serves on the powerful Judiciary Committee and does a very good job of explaining the Patriot Act. I happen to agree with him; but, as always, I also welcome your comments.
 
Where I Stand – Patriot Act Temporary Reauthorization
by Rep. Trey Gowdy
Washington -

I first want to thank the many constituents who have contacted me regarding this important issue.  I value your input, and urge you to continue actively engaging with our office.  I have enjoyed speaking personally with several of you on this issue, and will always remain accessible to explain my positions on the issues before Congress.
A little background on the vote:
The three provisions set for review, oversight and potential reauthorization are (1) the Lone Wolf Provision, (2) the Roving Wiretap Provision and (3) the Business Records Provision.  
The constitutionality of the Lone Wolf and Roving Wiretap Provisions has never been challenged.  The Business Records Provision was more controversial, and has been amended to address those concerns.  The USA PATRIOT Act actually erects additional safeguards in national security cases that do not exist in other categories of criminal conduct.  These additional layers of constitutional protection require more oversight and scrutiny than the garden-variety drug cases I investigated as a federal prosecutor.

1)  Section 6001 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorist Prevention Act (Lone Wolf Provision) – This provision allows law enforcement to conduct surveillance on non-U.S. citizens who act as  “lone wolves” without ties to an organized terror group or foreign power.  The United States faces varying threats to our safety, and national security agents must have the tools to prevent attacks planned by non-U.S. citizens acting outside the structure of an organized enemy. 
2)  Section 206 of the Patriot Act (Roving Wiretap Provision) – The roving wiretap tool has been available to law enforcement since 1986.  It allows for law enforcement agents, after proving probable cause on an initial warrant, to extend that warrant to other communications devices used by a suspect.  Instead of having to procure individual warrants on each device, which in the age of disposable phones can number in the thousands, this provision prevents suspects from evading surveillance by using multiple devices.  The provision also requires continuous monitoring by the FISA court and detailed reporting by law enforcement officers.
3)  Section 215 of the Patriot Act (Business Records Provision) – Business records are routinely sought and obtained in domestic investigations through the use of subpoenas, a practice I participated in countless times during my years in law enforcement.  This provision goes a step further, requiring FISA court approval to obtain third-party information, NOT personal documents.
H.R. 514 only covers these three provisions, and is merely a temporary reauthorization through the end of the year.  By voting for temporary reauthorization, we are ensuring our law enforcement agents have the necessary tools to keep our country safe from attack, while at the same time providing for a thorough examination of the law.  Instead of rushing legislation through behind closed doors without proper oversight, this measure sets the stage for meaningful hearings to address any civil liberties concerns.
I have personally approached Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Representative Jim Sensenbrenner (the original author of the USA PATRIOT Act), and Representative Lamar Smith (Chairman of the Judiciary Committee) urging them to conduct oversight hearings as soon as possible on the reauthorization of the three PATRIOT Act provisions set to expire at the end of 2011.  I have been assured these hearings will occur, and expect to be an active participant in the process by asking tough questions and expecting candid responses.
We acknowledge the need to provide oversight in all aspects of government, including law enforcement and national security.  I look forward to full, frank and fair debate on all aspects of the reauthorization in an open forum, with the public as an active partner in the oversight process.
-Trey
Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Comments Off

Ludwig von Mises for President?

I am doing a series of articles on GOP presidential candidates. I had planned to start with Congresswoman Michele Bachmann. Ludwig von Mises, the great Austrian economist, is actually ineligible for two reasons. First, like Barack Obama, von Mises was not born in the United States. Second, he has been dead for a long time. There is, however, one Republican presidential candidate this year who idolizes the economic writings of von Mises – Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.

A great friend in North Carolina forwarded the essay reproduced below by Stephen Moore. It is from a recent issue of the Wall Street Journal. This article is very well done, I commend it for your edification.

I met recently with the Upstate Coordinator for Michele.PAC and I have been appointed as the Greenville County (South Carolina) ”Grassroots Coordinator” for Michele Bachmann for President campaign. Dr. Christina Jeffrey has been appointed Grassroots Coordinator for Spartanburg County. I hope you will join us in an effort to carry South Carolina for Michele Bachmann. As always, I welcome reader’s comments.

By STEPHEN MOORE

 ”If I’m in, I’ll be all in,” says Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, artfully dodging my question of whether she’s running for president. Given that she just hired campaign strategist Ed Rollins, whose past clients include Ross Perot and Mike Huckabee, rumors abound. “We’re getting close,” she says, “and if I do run, like all my races, I will work like a maniac.”

That’s pretty much how she does everything, and it helps explain how the relatively junior congresswoman has become a tea party superstar—and uniquely adept at driving liberals bonkers.

Terry Shoffner

wintermoore

After spending a good part of two days with her in Washington as she scurries from one appointment to another, I have no doubt that Ms. Bachmann will announce her presidential bid soon. And it would be a mistake to count her out: She’s defied the prognosticators in nearly every race she’s run since thrashing an 18-year incumbent in the Minnesota Senate by 20 points in 2000. Says Iowa Congressman Steve King, “No one has electrified Iowa crowds like Michelle has.” 
 

Ms. Bachmann is best known for her conservative activism on issues like abortion, but what I want to talk about today is economics. When I ask who she reads on the subject, she responds that she admires the late Milton Friedman as well as Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. “I’m also an Art Laffer fiend—we’re very close,” she adds. “And [Ludwig] von Mises. I love von Mises,” getting excited and rattling off some of his classics like “Human Action” and “Bureaucracy.” “When I go on vacation and I lay on the beach, I bring von Mises.”
 

As we rush from her first-floor digs in the Cannon House Office Building to the House floor so she can vote, I ask for her explanation of the 2008 financial meltdown. “There were a lot of bad actors involved, but it started with the Community Reinvestment Act under Jimmy Carter and then the enhanced amendments that Bill Clinton made to force, in effect, banks to make loans to people who lacked creditworthiness. If you want to come down to a bottom line of ‘How did we get in the mess?’ I think it was a reduction in standards.”
 

She continues: “Nobody wanted to say, ‘No.’ The implicit and then the explicit guarantees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were sopping up the losses. Being on the Financial Services Committee, I can assure you, all roads lead to Freddie and Fannie.”

Ms. Bachmann voted against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) “both times,” she boasts, and she has no regrets since Congress “just gave the Treasury a $700 billion blank check.” She complains that no one bothered to ask about the constitutionality of these extraordinary interventions into the financial markets. “During a recent hearing I asked Secretary [Timothy] Geithner three times where the constitution authorized the Treasury’s actions, and his response was, ‘Well, Congress passed the law.’”
 

Insufficient focus on constitutional limits to federal power is a Bachmann pet peeve. “It’s like when you come up to a stop sign and you’re driving. Some people have it in their mind that the stop sign is optional. The Constitution is government’s stop sign. It says, you—the three branches of government—can go so far and no farther. With TARP, the government blew through the Constitutional stop sign and decided ‘Whatever it takes, that’s what we’re going to do.’”
 

Does this mean she would have favored allowing the banks to fail? “I would have. People think when you have a, quote, ‘bank failure,’ that that is the end of the bank. And it isn’t necessarily. A normal way that the American free market system has worked is that we have a process of unwinding. It’s called bankruptcy. It doesn’t mean, necessarily, that the industry is eclipsed or that it’s gone. Often times, the phoenix rises out of the ashes.”
 

She also bristles at the idea, pushed of late by the White House, that the auto bailouts were a big success for workers and taxpayers. “We’ll probably be out $15 billion. What was galling to so many investors was that Chrysler’s secured creditors were supposed to receive 100% payout of the first money. We essentially watched over 100 years of bankruptcy law thrown out the window and President Obama eviscerated the private property interests of the secured creditors. He called them ‘greedy’ for enforcing their own legal rights.”
 

So what would she have done? “For one, I believe my policies prior to ’08 would have been much different from [President Bush's]. I wouldn’t have spent so much money,” she says, pointing in particular at the Department of Education and the Medicare prescription drug bill. “I would have advocated for greater reductions in the corporate tax rate and reductions in the capital gains rate—even more so than what the president did.” Mr. Bush cut the capital gains rate to 15% from 20% in 2003.

She’s also no fan of the Federal Reserve’s decade-long policy of flooding the U.S. economy with cheap money. “I love a lowered interest rate like anyone else. But clearly the Fed has had competing goals and objectives. One is the soundness of money and then the other is jobs. The two different objectives are hard to reconcile. What has gotten us into deep trouble and has people so perturbed is the debasing of the currency.”
 

That’s why, if she were president, she wouldn’t renominate Ben Bernanke as Fed chairman: “I think that it’s very important to demonstrate to the American people that the Federal Reserve will have a new sheriff” to keep the dollar strong and stable.

As for foreign policy, she joined 86 other House Republicans last week in voting for the resolution sponsored by antiwar Democrat Dennis Kucinich to stop U.S. military action in Libya within 15 days. Is she a Midwestern isolationist? “I was opposed to the U.S. involvement in Libya from the very start,” she says. “President Obama has never made a compelling national security case on Libya.”
 

Even more striking, she says the 1973 War Powers Resolution, requiring congressional approval for military action after 60 days, is “the law of the land” and must be obeyed. That’s a notable difference from every recent president of either party, including Ronald Reagan.
 

 

Ms. Bachmann attributes many of her views, especially on economics, to her middle-class upbringing in 1960s Iowa and Minnesota. She talks with almost religious fervor about the virtues of living frugally, working hard and long hours, and avoiding debt. When she was growing up, she recalls admiringly, Iowa dairy farmers worked from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Her political opponents on the left portray her as a “she-devil,” in her words, a caricature at odds with her life accomplishments. She’s a mother of five, and she and her husband helped raise 23 teenage foster children in their home, as many as four at a time. They succeeded in getting all 23 through high school and later founded a charter school.
 

She got started in politics after seeing the failures in public schooling. “The kids were coloring posters in 11th grade algebra class,” she says. “I decided to do my duty, go to the Republican convention. I had on jeans, a sweatshirt with a hole in it, white moccasins, and I showed up in this auditorium and everyone said, ‘Why are we nominating this guy [Gary] Laidig every four years?’”
 

“I thought, ‘I’m nobody from nowhere but maybe if I challenge the guy, he’ll shape up a little bit.’ So I gave a five-minute speech on freedom, economic liberty and all the rest. And no one could believe it, but I won a supermajority on the first ballot and he was out on his keister.”
 

She ran for Congress in 2006, the worst year for Republicans in two decades. “Nancy Pelosi and all her horses spent $9.6 million to defeat me in that race”—almost three times what Ms. Bachmann had raised. She won 50% to 42%. In 2010, the Democrats and their union allies raised more than $10 million to try to defeat her. “My adversaries have certainly been highly motivated,” she says.
 

But her adversaries—or, at least, rivals—aren’t limited to the left. There’s Sarah Palin, with whom journalists are convinced she has frosty relations, and fellow Minnesotan Tim Pawlenty, now running for president. About Ms. Palin the congresswoman shrugs, “People want to see a mud-wrestling fight. They won’t get it from me because I like Sarah Palin and I respect her.” As for whether Mr. Pawlenty was a good governor, “I really don’t want to comment.”
 

Ever ready to cite stories from American history, Ms. Bachmann notes with a grin that the last House member to be elected president was James Garfield in 1880. If she were to take her shot, she’d run on an economic package reminiscent of Jack Kemp, the late congressman who championed supply-side economics and was the GOP vice presidential nominee in 1996. “In my perfect world,” she explains, “we’d take the 35% corporate tax rate down to nine so that we’re the most competitive in the industrialized world. Zero out capital gains. Zero out the alternative minimum tax. Zero out the death tax.”
 

The 3.8 million-word U.S. tax code may be irreparable, she says, a view she’s held since working as a tax attorney at the IRS 20 years ago. “I love the FAIR tax. If we were starting over from scratch, I would favor a national sales tax.” But she’s not a sponsor of the FAIR tax bill because she fears that enacting it won’t end the income tax, and “we would end up with a dual tax, a national sales tax and an income tax.”
 

Her main goal is to get tax rates down with a broad-based income tax that everyone pays and that “gets rid of all the deductions.” A system in which 47% of Americans don’t pay any tax is ruinous for a democracy, she says, “because there is no tie to the government benefits that people demand. I think everyone should have to pay something.”
 

On the stump she emphasizes an “America-centered energy policy” based on “drilling and mining for our rich resources here.” And she believes that repealing ObamaCare is a precondition to restoring a prosperous economy. “You cannot have a pro-growth economy and advise, simultaneously, socialized medicine.”
 

Her big challenge is whether the country is ready to support deep spending cuts. On this issue, she carries a sharper blade than everyone except Ron Paul. She voted for the Paul Ryan budget—but “with an asterisk.” Why? “The asterisk is that we’ve got a huge messaging problem [on Medicare]. It needs to be called the 55-and-Under Plan. I can’t tell you the number of 78-year-old women who think we’re going to pull the rug out from under them.”
 

 Ms. Bachmann also voted for the Republican Study Committee budget that cuts deeper and faster than even Mr. Ryan would. “We do have an obligation with Social Security and Medicare, and we have to recognize that” for those who are already retired, she says. But after that, it’s Katy bar the door: “Everything else is expendable to bring spending down,” and she’d ax “whole departments” including the Department of Education.
 

“I think people realize the crisis we face isn’t in 25 years or even 10 years off. It is right now. And people want it solved now—especially Republican primary voters.”
 
Mr. Moore is a member of The Journal’s editorial board.
Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

None Dare Call it Treason!

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

Marcus Tullius Cicero 42 BC

 

We already have a communist in the White House and the Democrats have a couple of them, Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders in Congress – even though the latter now claims to be “Independent.” Texas congressman Ron Paul thinks the Republicans need to nominate someone just as unAmerican on our side.

The word treason gets bandied about a lot. Many folks mistakenly call anything they dislike intensely, treason. The US constitution defines only two things as treason, making war against the United States; and, giving aid and comfort to our enemies in time of war. What exactly has treason to do with congressman Ron Paul?

Rep. Paul has endorsed the election of  ex-Marine Adam Kokesh in the Republican primary to represent the 3rd Congressional District of New Mexico. For any of you leathernecks reading this, I know the difference between an EX Marine, and a former Marine. Trust me, Kokesh is an EX Marine. Briefly, he bought a pistol illegally in Iraq, brought it back to the US in violation of USMC regulations, and then got busted bringing it on to a college campus.

Speaking of busted, the Marine Corps court martialed Sgt. Kokesh, busted him to Corporal, and kicked him out of the US Marine Corps with a less than honorable discharge. In February of 2007 Adam Kokesh joined communist front Iraq Veterans Against War (IVAW) an offshoot of John Kerry’s Vietnam Veterans Against War. Kokesh has also worked with and supported other communist organizations including, but not limited to:

SDS

Code Pink

A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition

United for Justice and Peace

Communist Party of America

Muslim Brotherhood [OK the MB is not communist, but they are just as evil]

Black Panthers

MoveOn.Org

 What does ex-Marine Kokesh do with Code Pink, IVAW, and the other commie outfits he hangs around with? Among other things, they confronted Gold Star families (those who have lost loved ones in service to this nation) in Vermont and Kokesh shouted obscenities at them.

 What does Adam Kokesh do for a  living? He is the host of his own TV show – on the Moscow funded RUSSIA TODAY television channel. Among the fund raisers for Adam Kokesh’s congressional campaign is David Duke’s Nazi organization Stormfront. There is an interesting discussion on the Stormfront website. They are united in supporting Adam Kokesh; but appear split over Ron Paul groupie Peter Schiff. Schiff is anti-American enough for them, but, being Jewish himself, cannot be trusted to also be anti-Semitic enough. One of his Nazi defenders is willing to give Schiff the benefit of the doubt because he is “right on the other issues.”

The 3rd Congressional District of New Mexico is rated by Real Clear Politics as D+7 – for those of you who are not political junkies, that means it is one of the most solidly Democrat districts in America. The Republican nominee in this district will never be elected. The national importance of this race is what it shows about Texas congressman Ron Paul who endorsed ex-Marine Kokesh in glowing terms.

 I intend to write a series of articles on each announced candidate for the Republican nomination. I will review their biographies, record of public service, and stand on the issues that are important to all of us. In the case of Dr. Ron Paul, I could have documented his many votes in Congress against securing our borders, or the way he brings home hundreds of millions in federal pork spending – earmarks – to have you the taxpayer subsidize the shrimping industry and some other businesses in his Texas district. I find it a bit hypocritical for the great Libertarian in Congress to be helping the federal government pick economic winners and losers in his district.

 However, no such analysis is necessary. The endorsement of Adam Kokesh for congress tells me that that my old friend Ron Paul has lost his marbles completely. Ron Paul has no business running for president. That’s my view; and, I welcome your comments.

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Trump Again?

Every four years The Donald as his legion of admirers affectionately call him, toys with the idea of running for president. The idle speculation always garners lots of free publicity. Trump craves free publicity like a bleached blonde in a Miss America pageant. What has been different this time around? The fact many of the Republican heavyweights, at least so far, have stayed out of the race and the grassroots are craving a plain spoken, strong leader – think of the Gipper.

Donald Trump was born with the proverbial silver spoon in his mouth. Heir of a wealthy real estate tycoon, he has gone on to achieve success in the world of real estate and high finance in his own right. Many place his personal fortune well over a billion dollars, and by any reasonable standard, the flamboyant, thrice married, developer is rich. The Donald may or may not be a strong leader, but he is plain spoken. Occasionally, in his enthusiasm, Trump punctuates his diatribes with the liberal use of a shorter word for fornication.

Given the absence of any GOP front runner, at least so far, Trump was actually doing very well in several polls. He placed above more serious potential candidates like Gingrich, Palin, Huckabee, and Romney, as well as a whole host of also rans. Recently The Donald announced his decision to forego the GOP primaries to pursue a renewed contract for his popular TV show The Celebrity Apprentice. The contract was reputed to be worth $60 million.

Those of us who take politics, and particularly the conservative movement, very seriously, breathed a collective sigh of relief. We were looking forward to seeing polls again without having to factor out a couple of folks who are obviously unelectable and a few probably not running.

All that changed last night when Donald Trump has supper with Sarah Palin at his favorite Pizza joint. In response to a question from a FOX News host, The Donald let it slip out, he is contemplating getting back in – after all the GOP primaries are over – if he thinks our nominee is too weak. After his TV show ends next year, Trump could self finance an independent run in a three way race between himself, Obama, and the GOP nominee.

For Trump this strategy has four advantages:

  • He gets to completely bypass real voters in real GOP primaries.
  • He can use his personal wealth to buy his way on to the ballot in many states.
  • He gets to short circuit the normal vetting process other candidates must endure.
  • He would once again become the darling of the media talking heads.

Such a candidacy is good for Donald Trump, great for Barack Hussein Obama, and a disaster for the United States of America. Short of the GOP nominating Ron Paul; Trump as an independent, is the only way we can lose a general election to the man from Kenya. Lets look at the historical record of so called third party campaigns. In the last hundred years such campaigns have changed the outcome of the presidential election three times. Without third party candidates drawing votes from the major party candidates, Woodrow Wilson, and Bill Clinton would not have been elected and Al Gore would have won the 2000 election without any recount needed.

Unable to wrest the GOP nomination from William Howard Taft, former President Theodore Roosevelt, created the Progressive Party and carried his fight to the general election of 1912, electing underdog Democrat nominee Woodrow Wilson in the process.

In 1992 disgruntled billionaire H. Ross Perot carried out a personal vendetta against George H. W. Bush. Perot ran for president on the Reform Party, and carried 19 million, mostly Republican leaning, popular votes. This was enough to allow dark horse candidate Bill Clinton to be elected with just 43% of the popular vote. Most pundits believe, had there been no Ross Perot candidacy, there would have been no Bill Clinton presidency.

While The Donald is unlikely to draw 19 million votes, as Perot did, presidential elections have been won and lost by as few as 97,000 popular votes in just one state – Florida. In the 2000 election, President George W. Bush received 2,912,790 popular votes in the state of Florida, just 537 votes more than candidate Al Gore! Even more astounding, the Green Party candidate, renegade lawyer, and professional rabble rouser, Ralph Nader drew 97,488 popular votes. Almost all of these votes would have gone to Democrat Al Gore, giving him Florida’s 25 electoral votes – and the presidency!

An independent Trump candidacy will draw off angry and disillusioned voters, many of them tea party supporters, who will otherwise support the nominee of the Republican party. A Trump candidacy is about the only way to save the failed “presidency” of Barack Obama.

Does America really need another well financed, high profile, third party to give the voters more choices on election day? In my opinion, that may actually be a really good idea; provided it is the Homosexual Negro Trial Lawyers Green Union Welfare Party! That’s my opinion, what’s yours? Feel free to leave your comments.

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | Tagged , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Why Memorial Day?

Winter 1777-78 Valley Forge, Pennsylvania – The US Capitol, then at Philadelphia, fell to British occupation September 26th. George Washington’s Continental Army, short of just about everything, and numbering only 12,000 men, retreated twenty five miles to Valley Forge and encamped for the winter. Among the members of this rag tag band, was a boy of 16, who, like most of the American army there, had no shoes. A French nobleman, Chevalier de Pontgibaud, described the scene: “Soon I came in sight of the camp. My imagination had pictured an army with uniforms, the glitter of arms, standards, Etc., in short, military pomp of all sorts; Instead of the imposing spectacle I had expected, I saw, grouped together or standing alone, a few militiamen, poorly clad, and for the most part without shoes -”

 Of these, 2000 died of starvation and disease. In spite of hardships, Washington managed to find provisions, and train them. When they left Valley Forge, in the summer of 1778, for the first time, America had an Army!

 February – March 1836, San Antonio de Bexar, Republic of Texas – One hundred eighty six  volunteers, many from Tennessee and South Carolina, barricaded themselves inside the Alamo. William Barrett Travis, born in Saluda County, South Carolina, commanded what passed for Texas’ regular army. Volunteers from Tennessee, served under Col. Davy Crockett. The rest were with James Bowie, a hard drinking, knife fighting, frontiersman, who owned six million acres of land in Texas and Mexico. He married the first cousin of the Mexican dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. The same Mexican dictator who now, surrounded the 186 defenders of the Alamo with 3,000 battle hardened troops and threatened no quarter for rebels!

 Refusing to surrender, they raised the first Texas flag and, held out against overwhelming odds for thirteen bloody days. With their lives, they bought time for General Sam Houston to raise and train the Army that defeated Santa Anna April 21st at San Jacinto, securing the freedom of Texas.

 1862, Eudora, Arkansas – A company of volunteer infantry was raised in Chicot County, Arkansas. Among the men who enlisted in the Confederate service was Private Edward Green Allen who participated in numerous battles, and spent almost a year in a Yankee POW camp. Paroled at the end of the war, he returned home, raised eight children, and farmed cotton on the banks of the Mississippi river.

 December 7, 1941, Eudora, Arkansas – Three brothers from Eudora grew up eight miles from the Mississippi River. When the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor, Charlie James Allen was already in the US Navy. He would die a year later when a Nazi U-Boat torpedoed and sank the U.S.S. Jacob Jones in the Atlantic. Older brother Benjamin Franklin Allen, Jr. served in the Marine Corps in the Pacific. He survived the war, worked for the Bechtel Corporation, built nuclear power plants, and lived to be 93. Youngest of the three brothers, William Edward Allen, was drafted into the Army early in 1943. He landed in Italy  in September 1943 as part of the 36th Infantry Division (Texas National Guard) and participated in the liberation of Rome. Landing at Normandy, August 15, 1944, as part of  Lt. General Alexander Patch’s Seventh Army, he helped liberate France, and participated in the Battle of the Bulge.

 In 1945 he helped liberate the Nazi concentration camp at Bergen Belsen. He would be haunted the rest of his life by the memories of emaciated prisoners, starved till they could no longer speak, or eat, and knowing they would soon die.

 December 7, 1941, Edna, Texas – Hearing news of the Japs bombing Pearl Harbor; brothers Charlie, Gillus, and Eddie Reese, all joined the United States Navy, and went to war. Younger brother Tony Calvin Reese, joined the Army, and served in Europe. Eddie earned a Silver Star on Guadalcanal. He was credited with saving the lives of six fellow Sea Bees by throwing an unexploded grenade back at the Japs. The grenade exploded just as he released it, taking off two fingers, and the thumb, of his right hand. All four Reese brothers would survive the war, marry, and have lots of children.

 December 13, 1968, Houston, Texas – Days after his eighteenth birthday, a volunteer stood beside 68 other boys, most of whom were drafted, and took the oath to preserve, the constitution.  Over the next four years he served on the DMZ in Korea, and two tours of duty in Vietnam. He earned a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, and an Air Medal, on a hilltop 20 miles west of a place called Phu Bai, Republic of Vietnam, for a firefight the night of November 15 – 16, 1969. He later earned twenty-one other medals, and ribbons, and three honorable discharges.

 Memorial Day, 2011, Your Home Town – Please enjoy your long weekend. Have a cookout and invite friends over for steaks – enjoy a cold beer, or two or three. Take your kids swimming, hug them and tell them you love them – even if it does embarrass the crap out of them. Take the boat to the lake and get in some fishing. Watch some fireworks, watch TV, or perhaps take in a movie. Buy your grandchildren ice cream cones, and take your wife out dancing. Oh, and if you happen to see a bunch of old men, wearing funny looking hats, carrying American flags & hanging around the cemetery - don’t worry about it. They are not part of any cult.

 They are my buddies from the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the American Legion. I will pause to remember the 16 year old boy at Valley Forge, my Great, great, great, great, Grandfather on the Holt side. I will remember James Bowie’s aunt was my Great, great, great grandmother. The Confederate POW, Edward Green Allen? He was my Great, great, grandfather. Benjamin Franklin Allen, Jr., Charlie James Allen, Charlie James Reese, Tony Calvin Reese, Gillus Reese, and Eddie Leroy Reese – the one with the missing fingers – were all my uncles. T-5 Sgt. William Edward Allen, the draftee who helped liberate Bergen Belsen, was my Daddy. They are all gone now.

 The kid who joined the Army in Houston, and went off to Korea, and Vietnam, to fight communism – was me. For over forty years, I have helped put flags on the graves of veterans each Memorial day. I would like to tell you the men in my family are different from yours; or even special. The fact is, the Allens are not particularly exceptional. Almost every family in America has ancestors who sacrificed to secure your freedom.

 Please, by all means, enjoy your holiday to the fullest on this Memorial day! That’s what we were all fighting for – just don’t forget, that freedom was bought at a price. If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, thank a veteran!

Share This With Your Friends:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Posted in Conservative Republican Politics in South Carolina | 3 Comments